::scr Re: doesn't have the morlocks
Alaric Snell
scr@thegestalt.org
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 16:30:12 +0100
On Monday 08 April 2002 16:13, you wrote:
> > I'd say that people were "born wired in a certain way", yes,
> > but that's not
> > as simple as it sounds. It's not prejudice or self
> > limitation. I appear to
> > have been born with a natural grasp for certain types of
> > system which makes
> > me good with computers and mathematics and physics and stuff,
> > but I end up
> > trying to map everything into that kind of system which can
> > be a handicap.
>
> But I don't "believe" in natural ability. It's simply
> you were exposed to enviromental factors that allowed that development.
Ah! Nurture as opposed to nature?
I have some confidence in nature playing a role: I grew up with my mother and
only met my father a few times a year, but have since found that I am very
similar to the entire male line of my family.
When I first really got to meet them, it was like... coming home.
> > So it's not as simple as saying that I'd make a bad artist; I
> > wouldn't be
> > good at being an artist like most artists are, but I could
> > probably bring my
> > own worldview to art in a potentially useful way.
>
> Looking at that sentence again, it seems to be a bit contradictory.
Hmmm... how?
> > Saying that this is a form of prejudice, or self limiting, is
> > a bit hasty.
> >
> > > dan
> >
> > ABS
>
> you've just said that you wouldn't be a good artist!
"I wouldn't be good at being an artist like most artists are"
Meaning: If I did my best at being good at art, I would be good at art in a
different way to people who are *primarily* artists.
ABS
--
Alaric B. Snell
http://www.alaric-snell.com/ http://RFC.net/ http://www.warhead.org.uk/
Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software