::scr Seti@Home & Global Warming

Dave Turner scr@thegestalt.org
Fri, 17 May 2002 13:11:20 +0100


--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 08:03:23AM -0400, Chris Devers wrote:
> I'd be interested in seeing a comparison between an "idle" computer and
> one that is crunching Seti units. My guess is that the power consumption
> difference isn't going to be that significant

Even compared to machines that sleep after a period of idle time and then
dump the memory state to disk and turn off?

There's always the scale of this to consider as well.  Over 3m machines,
that's got to be a pretty hefty power consumption.


--=20
Dave Turner
http://figroll.com/

--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE85PNowM5fO8TkIMkRAvd3AJ4pVDz5/VZYrrw2K1PWN0oU1HdnAACeMoto
DXva8R0yhbYY82tulaZrOtQ=
=Rs3L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA--