[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ::scr Dressing up the computer

To: scr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: ::scr Dressing up the computer
From: Chris Devers <cdevers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 10:17:04 -0600 (CST)
In-reply-to: <m2eliv9hi4.fsf@bofh.org.uk>
List-archive: <http://thegestalt.org/pipermail/scr/>
List-help: <mailto:scr-request@thegestalt.org?subject=help>
List-id: just zis list, ya know? <scr.thegestalt.org>
List-post: <mailto:scr@thegestalt.org>
List-subscribe: <http://thegestalt.org/mailman/listinfo/scr>, <mailto:scr-request@thegestalt.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://thegestalt.org/mailman/listinfo/scr>, <mailto:scr-request@thegestalt.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: scr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: scr-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Piers Cawley wrote:

> Not sure what the state of the gaze tracking art is though.

Not exactly the current topic, but dovetailing with it nicely:

http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20020228.html

Robert X. Cringely talking about getting optimal video compression by
incorporating eye tracking technology, such that the observed area is sent
essentially uncompressed while the peripheral (almost everything) is
allowed to degrade severely. He figures that if it can be pulled off, it
could lead to drastic jumps in comression (10x, 100x) and the average user
wouldn't even notice the lossiness. 

It's an interesting idea, but I'll wait to see a working prototype. 


-- 
Chris Devers                           chdevers@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Apache / mod_perl / http://homepage.mac.com/chdevers/resume/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ::scr Dressing up the computer
  - From: Snorre Milde

References:
- Re: ::scr Dressing up the computer
  - From: Piers Cawley

Prev by Date: Re: ::scr Dressing up the computer
Next by Date: Re: ::scr Dressing up the computer
Previous by thread: Re: ::scr Dressing up the computer
Next by thread: Re: ::scr Dressing up the computer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread