Re: [london.food] Gosh, we're nearly four years old.

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2007/01/03]

From: Nigel Rantor
Subject: Re: [london.food] Gosh, we're nearly four years old.
Date: 16:44 on 03 Jan 2007

Juliet Kemp wrote:
> Not sure about venue; I'm not sure how possible it is to manage
> gourmet-ness that is compatible with both carnivores & non-carnivores
> (am assuming that we don't want to go to e.g. Manna, though obviously
> would be v much in favour of that!)  :-/

There are non-carnivorous gourmets?

*boggle*

Sounds like a contradiction in terms to me.

   n

There's stuff above here

Juliet Kemp 16:31 on 03 Jan 2007
- Nigel Rantor 16:44 on 03 Jan 2007
  - David Cantrell 19:29 on 03 Jan 2007
RE: [london.food] Gosh, we're nearly four years old. John Corcoran 16:59 on 03 Jan 2007
Re: [london.food] Gosh, we're nearly four years old. Billy Abbott 10:03 on 04 Jan 2007
Simon Wistow 09:48 on 08 Jan 2007
- Kake L Pugh 09:52 on 08 Jan 2007
  - Jakob Whitfield 21:42 on 08 Jan 2007
    - too deep to show
- Rev Simon Rumble 22:58 on 08 Jan 2007
  - Simon Wistow 23:05 on 08 Jan 2007
    - too deep to show
- Kake L Pugh 11:45 on 25 Jan 2007
  - Simon Wistow 18:55 on 25 Jan 2007
    - too deep to show
Kake L Pugh 15:31 on 27 Jan 2007
- Jakob Whitfield 19:47 on 27 Jan 2007
  - Billy Abbott 00:21 on 28 Jan 2007
RE: [london.food] Gosh, we're nearly four years old. Russell Joanne \(ST\) 13:38 on 30 Jan 2007
- Re: [london.food] Gosh, we're nearly four years old. salvo 19:09 on 30 Jan 2007
- Simon Wistow 19:27 on 30 Jan 2007
  - Simon Wistow 21:01 on 30 Jan 2007
- James O'Brien 11:11 on 31 Jan 2007
  - Rev Simon Rumble 21:44 on 31 Jan 2007
    - too deep to show
- Hugh Macdonald 22:55 on 03 Feb 2007

Generated at 00:01 on 04 Feb 2007 by mariachi 0.52