[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

::scr one-post tangent; clueless



on 22/4/02 5:49 pm, David Cantrell at david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> I'm not the only one to have some
>> clueless fuck send me 5Mb email attachments when I'm on a dial-up
>> connection, or vital information in a proprietary format that I cannot
>> read.
> 
> They're not clueless fucks, they're ignorant.  Ignorance is a forgivable
> sin.  Continued exhibition of clueless behaviour after being educated is
> not.

Fair play, good point, well made and a sentiment I'd echo myself (but not
very BOHFish of you, Dave). However, sometimes you do get people like the
marketing manager that blech and I used to work with[0] who, when our
15-strong development team complained that they couldn't read his missives
since they were word attachements, suggested that the company shell out
for 15 WMS Office licenses rather than have him save as text. Now that
*is* clueless, surely?

* jonah considers whether to post this since it is in danger of going off
topic 

Ah, feggit, people might get a yuk out of it.

-- 
matt
it's time to kick God's doors down

[0] Inspiration for the "guide to mogulry" in-joke webpages on snurfer dot
org.