[london.food] Nearly-a-review: Archipelago, W1

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2006/3/4]

From: Tom Sulston
Subject: [london.food] Nearly-a-review: Archipelago, W1
Date: 10:23 on 04 Mar 2006
What ho,

Apologies for the mahousive lateness of of this. (What's a couple of =20
years between friends?)

The ravages of time and vast amount of booze consumed that night have =20=

dulled my memory. Please correct any factual errors, or chip in with =20
an opinion.

I've not been doing a lot of restaurant-going recently, thanks to a =20
poverty-inducing month-long cookery course at http://=20
www.ashburtoncookeryschool.co.uk. It was great, though. And I =20
recommend the place to you all.

Tom.



Archipelago - London W1.

It's hard nowadays to find a restaurant without a theme - Pacific Rim =20=

Fusion, the glamour of Old Europe, and the like. Most of the time, =20
these are short-lived gimmicky flashes in the pan that barely allow =20
time for the grout to dry on the kitchen tiles before the place is =20
gutted for the next crackpot venture. Archepelago's theme, however, =20
is different. Actually, to be more specific, the theme is difference: =20=

everything about this place is designed to be unusual and ecletic - =20
the culinary equivalent of putting Marylin Manson next to Mozart in =20
one's record collection.

Opulent decay is a strong theme in the decor of the dining room. Each =20=

piece of furniture is noticably different; the walls are decorated =20
with objets trouv=E9s from various cultures, and soft furnishings are =20=

decorated with throws and cushions of every tone and fabric =20
imaginable (with the possible exception of chain mail, but it =20
wouldn't surprise me...) Even the table furniture is unmatched and =20
quirky. Discussions over who has the most interesting fork swiftly =20
degenerated into who had the most inappropriate wine glass. (I think =20
that Ben's bucket-sized vessel was more favourable than my thimble.) =20
The overall atmosphere was something between a Moroccan bazaar and =20
one of those middle-England furniture shops that sells candles and =20
roughly-carved figures from Polynesia or thereabouts.

Cocktails were served, and menus were delivered. As to be expected =20
from a place that positively revels in eclectism and opulence, the =20
delivery was carefully thought out and beautifully executed. Menus =20
come as ribbon-wrapped scrolls of aged paper; cocktails with quirky =20
garnishes (My "Swamp Thing", tasting like the offspring of of a Mint =20
Julep and a Mojito, came with a golden rubber frog semi-submerged in =20
its green murky depths.)

Interestingly, although the menu contains exotic ingredients, the =20
composition is pretty standard for western European cuisine: one =20
protein component, one starch, and something vegetative for flavour =20
and texture contrast - typically something fruity and sharp. This =20
makes sense for pitching exotic fare at a primarily British audience =20
without deviating too far from the "meat and two veg" norm. That =20
having been said, it does pose an interesting question about how =20
normalised meal composition is across the world: how do different =20
cultures compose their dishes for maximum appeal, while retaining a =20
nutritional balance?

As we were a sizeable group, we ended up with a fair cross-section of =20=

the oddness on offer. I plumped for the conservative options, mostly =20
out of reaction to my companions' lust for the eccentric, but also =20
out of a fear that "that probably tastes a bit like chicken". In the =20
case of the peacock, the latter certainly turned out to be true!

Starter: Duck salad, with a pomegranete and pistachio dressing

First impressions of this dish were extremely favourable: it looks =20
fantastic. The salad leaves (mostly red chard) were verdant and shiny =20=

with a rich, sweet dressing. The slices of duck were perfectly-cooked =20=

- caramelised on the outside, and dark red within. Pomegranete pieces =20=

and pistachio halves dotted the plate, looking flavoursome and crisp.

And the flavour was good: all of the ingredients were as fresh and =20
flavoursome as their appearance suggested. The duck was lovely - =20
smooth and soft and rich, which contrasted nicely with the =20
pomegranete and pistacho, with a crisp texture and sharp flavour.

Granita: There were three granite, and we tried them all. The tequila =20=

and black pepper was king - the pepper really opens up the tequila =20
flavour, which is blissfully shorter in the mouth than the liquid =20
variety. The strawberry and vanilla (CHECK?) was overpoweringly =20
saccharine, but the mango (CHECK?) trod the fine line between sharp =20
and sweet nicely.

Main: Honey and Chilli pork loin with lime-flavoured couscous

Another beautifully presented dish =3D a rectangular plate with a mound =20=

of cous-cous, pressed into a square, and a deep bowl of thinly-sliced =20=

stir-fried pork.

The cous-cous was excellent - very limey without being too sour, and =20
nice and fluffy. The pork was less good, being extremely rich and =20
sweet, and not very anisey. It was, however, piping hot, and =20
beautifully textured. I think that this dish would be improved with =20
less pork, and a side dish of something bitter and crunchy (radiccio =20
salad?) to counter the very sweet taste of the meat.

'Love bug' salad with crickets and locusts:

The crickets (I didn't get a locust!) were lovely: crisp and nutty =20
and light. I've become an instant convert to their crunchy goodness =20
and will be ordering them at every available opportunity. The salad =20
otherwise was OK, with plenty of chard (which I like), but the =20
dressing was almost as sweet as the honey pork, and rendered the =20
whole thing a bit opressive and not terribly refreshing.

Dessert:

I would like to say that the dessert was as wild culinary experience =20
as the savoury courses. However, with the exception of the chocolate-=20
covered scorpions, they were pretty nondescript in both their design =20
and execution: sweet and fruity. The scorpions were enjoyed by those =20
that tried them: "A bit like a Crunchie bar", was the overriding =20
consensus.

Overall, Archipelago was a really enjoyable experience. The food was =20
interesting, fresh, and competently cooked, but with a tendency =20
towards tasting rather cloying. But it's not the sort of restaurant =20
that you'd go to for the quality of the food, more for an exotic =20
experience. And Archipelago certainly delivers on that front - all =20
your senses are bombarded with quirky, offbeat curiosities. It's a =20
lot of fun.=

Generated at 00:00 on 08 Mar 2006 by mariachi 0.41