[london.food] [REVIEW] Amaryllis, Glasgow

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2003/12/23]

From: Tom Sulston
Subject: [london.food] [REVIEW] Amaryllis, Glasgow
Date: 15:48 on 23 Dec 2003
For those that don't do LJ:

Amaryllis, One Devonshire Gardens, Glasgow.

It was a beautiful sunny midwinter Sunday afternoon: the perfect day to 
enjoy a fine lunch in Glasgow's West End. Hopes for Amaryllis were 
high: Gordon Ramsey is the most decorated chef in the UK, with a 
passionate eye for detail and perfection in every nuance of the dining 
experience.

Amaryllis was also the home restaurant of the late David Dempsey, who 
won a Michelin star there before moving to London to die a bizarre 
tabloid death. With this mixture of rock 'n' roll and haute cuisine, 
hopes were high.

After a small delay while R recovered from the previous night's 
viccisitudes, he and A and I settled into the bay window of the cosy, 
spacious dining room of the Edwardian end-terrace that is One 
Devonshire Gardens. Menus and bottles of water and the like were passed 
around and we all opted for the 6-course menu prestige, which seemed to 
be the best way of trying a variety of the delights that Mr. Ramsey's 
team would have in store for us.

In order: the 6 courses:

* Pumpkin veloute with chanterelles and black truffle.

A highlight of the meal: rich, sweet and creamy in flavour, yet light 
in texture. Strangely un-pumpkiny, but the sweetness bore the earthy 
mushroom and truffle tones well. A small amount of grated black 
truffle, but a strong flavour indicates a healthy slosh of truffle oil. 
Not the sort of dish that I would usually order, but utterly fantastic, 
and worth returning for.

* Terrine of foie gras and confit duck with spinach, green beans and 
cauliflower.

Perfectly smooth terrine de foie gras, layered with paper-thin confit 
of duck and wilted spinach. Excellent texture, but the flavour was 
somewhat mute, given the strength of the component ingredients. I 
suspect that this is down to it having been somewhat more exuberantly 
chilled than was strictly necessary, although it wasn't noticably cold 
per se, I'd have expected it to have been at a warm room temperature 
than the cellar temperature at which it was served. Lovely sweet green 
beans and cauliflower provided an excellent contrast of texture, as did 
a slice of oiled and toasted ciabatta.

* Pan-fried fillet of sea bream with capers and beurre noisette. Seared 
scallop with spinach.

Another highlight. The skin on the fish was expertly and evenly scored 
and crisped, but the flesh remained moist and delicated. Perfection. 
The absolute mound of capers was a real treat, and a pleasant surprise. 
Sweet and sharp, and no nasty vinegariness from your common-or-garden 
from-a-jar variety. Beurre noisette was rich and sumptuous, with plenty 
of sweet shallots. However, it was more like a beurre blanc: the butter 
wasn't browned enough, leaving the sauce insufficiently sweet, which 
meant that it came out a bit heavy and fatty for the delicate fish. The 
garnish of a seared king scallop on a bed of buttered spinach was 
divine: very rich and flavoursome.

* Roast saddle of lamb with crushed potatoes, caramelised shallots, 
spinach and a thyme jus.

Bit of a disappointment, given the strength of the previous courses. 
Despite having been ordered rare, the lamb was definitely tending 
towards the medium end of not-pink-enough. However, it was still 
decently moist, so not a huge loss, even for one with as passionate a 
distaste for overdone meat as I. The jus was thin and bland, however. A 
more intense reduction would be called for, as the thyme flavour was 
barely noticable. The potatoes were nice and buttery, but otherwise 
inexciting. Shallots were excellent - sweet and soft and a beautiful 
golden brown. At this point, the fact that spinach was being served 
with everything started to give me the fear. I'm rather fond of 
spinach, but the thought of finding it delicatly sprinkled over my 
pudding was enough to induce a cold sweat.

* Platter of cheeses: Chaumes, dolcelatte, camembert, cheddar, ashed 
goats cheese.

Despite taking an age to arrive, during which we were wondering if the 
cheese was merely being sliced, or if some poor sod out the back was 
pulling curds out of whey in a cloth, the cheese course was another 
disappointment. Each of the cheeses was a perfectly adequate example of 
their genre, but none were outstandingly excellent - suggesting that 
their sourcing had been conducted in a fairly lacklustre way. The 
accompanying oatcakes were jolly good, though - nice and crisp and 
flaky. Although the purist in me would insist that cheese served before 
pudding should be with a salad, and cheese after should be with 
biscuits. A glass of top-notch LBV port was a saving grace, although 
punitively dear.

* Saffron rice pudding with prunes.

Another disappointment: although the pudding tasted excellent, with the 
delicate spiciness and cream of the rich pudding complimenting nicely 
the rich sweetness of the excellent prunes; plating was on a par with 
that of a school canteen, and well below the excellent standard thus 
far set. While goopy stuff isn't the most inspiring or easy thing to 
arrange on a plate, the presentation smacked of the chef wanting to 
knock off as soon as humanly possible.

* Coffee and petits fours.

Were jolly nice, although not earth-shatteringly good. Small 
bitter-chocolate truffles were nice and smooth and complimented the 
very dark coffee excellently.

* Service.

Was pretty mediocre, unfortunately. Although the table staff were all 
cheery and efficient, there were some unexplained over-long pauses 
between courses - something of which I'm usually very forgiving, since 
it usually means that chaos is going on in the kitchen, but in this 
case there seemed to be plenty of slack time, and the dining room was 
nowhere near capacity. The fact that there are two separate dining 
rooms means that table staff were frequently nowhere to be found, which 
was a bit of an annoyance.

Overall, the experience was good, but uninspiring. The absolute 
culinary perfection that Gordon Ramsey espouses and enforces was 
absent, although the results were decent. Strangely, the 6-course 'Menu 
Prestige' seemed to be a lot weaker than the normal 3-course table 
d'hote, which is a bit of an anomaly in a world where the tasting menu 
is normally carte blanche for the chef to show off some exciting skills 
and really push the quality of the food. At Amaryllis, it seemed that 
it had been bolted on as an afterthought, with insufficiently 
imaginative and beautiful dishes to justify it.

Final damage per head, with a couple of glasses of perfectly decent 
Fleurie was around the 70UKP mark. Which was pretty reasonable for 6 
courses, but at the level of cuisine at which Amaryllis is operating, 
I'd expect 6 excellent courses, rather than 3 excellent, and 3 
mediocre. Furthermore, it would be nice to see a little creativity 
slipped into the menu, maybe with the odd amuse-bouche here or there - 
as it is Amaryllis is slipping back to the bare minimum required to 
provide fine dining, and only just getting away with it.

-- 
Tom Sulston
+44 77 99 89 80 44
http://www.sulston.net


Generated at 10:45 on 03 Jan 2004 by mariachi 0.41