[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ::scr long waffley post about consciousness
[NOTE: Attempting to pour oil on the waters here. Please don't apply
a match to them or this *will* get messy]
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 03:44:00PM +0100, Richard Marr wrote:
> > I know Simon managed to leave the specified topic of ::scr
> > completely vague when he started it, but also threatened that
> > anything off topic would be kicked, but I never expected
> > anything like this to carry on so long.
>
> It's been oooo... a couple of hours since the thread started. Truly
> epic.
Back on the ranch we measure thread length in terms of messages/bytes
expended, not time. This so far is one of the longer threads,
especially if you see it as a continuation of the meta-art one we had
before.
> > I should just ignore it, given that I can't agree with the
> > second line of your first post in this thread (hey kids;
> > souls don't exist. tell your friends. death is not lived
> > through) but then I was under Blackfriars when this list was
> > started and this thread has been enough to make me want to
> > leave I'll just post this.
>
> Sorry, I thought this was a forum for discussion.
>
> Guess not.
My reading of this: http://thegestalt.org/scr/faq.html brings strong
attention to this part
"At least make a pretence of them being technically orientated"
which at least to my pointer-obsessed brain this thread doesn't seem
to be hitting too squarely.
Should we be calling for an adjudication here?
--
Richard Clamp <richardc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>